FAQs about the going concern assessment
August 30, 2025
The going concern assumption underlies financial reporting under U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) unless management has plans to liquidate. If a going concern issue is identified but not adequately disclosed, the omission might be considered “pervasive” because it can affect users’ understanding of the financial statements as a whole. So it’s critical to get it right. Here are answers to common questions about this assumption to help evaluate your company’s ability to continue operating in the future.
Who’s responsible for the going concern assessment?
Management is responsible for making the going concern assessment and providing related footnote disclosures. Essentially, your management team must determine whether there are conditions or events — either from within the company or external factors — that raise substantial doubt about your company’s ability to continue as a going concern within 12 months after the date that the financial statements:
- Will be issued, or
- Will be available to be issued (to prevent auditors from holding financial statements for several months after year end to see if the company survives).
Then you must provide appropriate documentation to prove to external auditors that management’s assessment is reasonable and complete.
What are the signs of “substantial” doubt?
Substantial doubt exists when relevant conditions and events, considered in the aggregate, indicate that it’s probable that the company won’t be able to meet its current obligations as they become due. Examples of adverse conditions or events that might cause management to doubt the going concern assumption include:
- Recurring operating losses,
- Working capital deficiencies,
- Loan defaults,
- Asset disposals, and
- Loss of a key person, franchise, customer or supplier.
If management identifies a going concern issue, they should consider whether any mitigating plans will alleviate the substantial doubt. Examples include plans to raise equity, borrow money, restructure debt, cut costs, or dispose of an asset or business line.
What role does your auditor play?
The Auditing Standards Board’s Statement on Auditing Standards (SAS) No. 132, The Auditor’s Consideration of an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern, is intended to promote consistency between the auditing standards and accounting guidance under U.S. GAAP. The current auditing standard requires auditors to obtain sufficient audit evidence regarding management’s use of the going concern basis of accounting in the preparation of the financial statements. The standard also calls for auditors to conclude, based on their professional judgment, on the appropriateness of management’s assessment.
Audit procedure must evaluate whether management’s assessment:
- Covers a period of at least 12 months after the financial statements are issued or available to be issued,
- Is consistent with other information obtained during audit procedures, and
- Considers relevant subsequent events that happen after the end of the accounting period.
During fieldwork, auditors assess management’s forecasts, assumptions and mitigation plans and arrive at an independent going concern assessment.
The evaluation of whether there’s substantial doubt about a company’s ability to continue as a going concern can be performed only on a complete set of financial statements at an enterprise level. So, the going concern auditing standard doesn’t apply to audits of single financial statements, such as balance sheets and specific elements, accounts or items of a financial statement.
How are going concern issues reported in audited financial statements?
The audit team also reviews the reasonableness of management’s disclosures. When a going concern issue exists and the disclosure is adequate, the auditor can issue an unmodified opinion. However, it will typically include an emphasis-of-matter paragraph that explains the nature of the going concern issue.
Conversely, if management fails to provide a going concern disclosure or the disclosure is inadequate or incomplete, the financial statements won’t conform with GAAP. As a result, the auditor will either issue 1) a qualified opinion if the issue is material but not pervasive, or 2) an adverse opinion if it’s both material and pervasive.
Sometimes, the scope of an audit may be limited if management won’t provide sufficient support for its going concern conclusion or the auditor can’t gather enough evidence independently. This situation, if pervasive, can lead to a disclaimer of opinion — a major red flag to lenders and investors.
Auditors as gatekeepers
By independently evaluating management’s assessment, testing assumptions and insisting on clear disclosures, auditors safeguard stakeholders from being misled when substantial doubt exists. As you prepare for your next audit, be sure to carefully document your going concern assessment, anticipate auditor scrutiny, and be ready to communicate candidly about risks and mitigation strategies. Contact us for guidance on navigating these complex requirements in today’s uncertain economic environment. Our team of experienced CPAs is here to help.
© 2025
